This past Saturday, someone at Hawaii's Emergency Management Agency pressed the wrong button. As you’ve undoubtedly heard, this sent a message via cell phones, radio, and even the highway warning system that a ballistic missile strike had been launched against the state.
Given our nation’s icy tension with North Korea, residents and tourists were understandably scared and panicked.
What’s more, many people didn't know the location of their local bomb shelters (and people under 35 probably don’t even remember evacuation drills that included bomb shelters). In fact, individuals were so unprepared for a possible missile strike that PBS reported the Google search phrase “survive nuclear” spiked during the false alarm.
While this isn’t how anyone wants to learn about surviving a potential attack, the false alarm probably prepared the Hawaiian Islands for a potential attack better than any routine drill. In the days following the false alarm, residents undoubtedly researched the location of their local bomb shelter; discussed plans for communicating with and protecting family members during an emergency; and identified other precautions they can take in the event of an attack.
Additionally, the state’s Emergency Management Agency has also learned their systems for ensuring accurate warnings aren’t fool proof.
I don’t want to minimize the very real sense of fear and panic that Hawaiians and tourists felt that day, but how do we respond when someone in our organization makes a mistake? Do we immediately seek to identify and punish the person who made a mistake or do we want to make this a teachable moment? Do we want to use the mistake as an opportunity to build a stronger organization and a healthier team?
In the spirit of recognizing that we all make mistakes, it might be helpful to acknowledge some of my bigger blunders and how my employer responded:
Of the many mistakes I made in my first job, the two most significant involved the submission of grant proposals. In that very first year after graduating from college, I drafted a proposal to a local women’s foundation that included an anticipated outcome of a certain number of women leaving abusive partners. When conducting the pre-award site visit, the foundation’s volunteers expressed genuine disbelief that we would make such an unrealistic commitment, and they noted that such a naiveté did not reflect well on the organization’s expertise. Looking back almost 25 years later, I share and understand their concerns.
The organization could have fired or demoted me but instead implemented a better system for program supervisors to review grant proposals as part of the drafting process. Consequently, I learned about programming from more experienced professionals and the organization submitted stronger grant proposals.
A few years later when the grant department grew, this system for internally reviewing grant proposals served our agency well.
The second big mistake occurred after the grant department started to grow. My responsibilities increased to include supervising a grant writer and managing accreditation for the organization. During this transition, I missed the deadline to request the renewal of a $10,000 grant.
The day after the proposal would have been due, I realized my mistake. If this was a punitive environment, many people would have quietly removed the proposal from the shared spreadsheet and hoped no one asked about it. But in this amazing environment that accepted mistakes as part of a larger learning process, I openly shared my failure. I spoke with both the Development Director and the Executive Director, explained that I missed an important deadline, and noted the steps I would take to ensure that this never happened again.
Once again, the organization didn’t even write me up. They thanked me for my candor and clearly communicated that meeting deadlines was a critical part of my job.
And I was true to my word - never missing another grant deadline. After all, it’s okay to make a mistake, but it’s not okay to make the same mistake repeatedly.
How does your organization respond to mistakes?
About the Author:
Read Dolph Ward Goldenburg's Bio here
Whether you refer to your senior staff fundraiser as the development director, chief development officer, or vice president of external relations, this one position has the greatest influence over the economic engine that drives your non-profit organization. For the Successful Nonprofits Podcast, we recently interviewed Emma Kieran of PilotPeak Consulting about specific steps CEOs and their organizations can take to increase the effectiveness (and retain) their chief development officer (CDO). If you would rather listen to this interview, you can download it here.
Dolph: Hey Emma thanks for joining us today. . . . what got you interested in the CEO - CDO relationship.
Emma: That's a great question. Like you, I have been in a lot of different fundraising positions in the past and what I've noticed is that the turnover is really high. And unfortunately, it takes a long time for a CDO to develop really deep relationships with board members and donors and that turnover is really hurting their performance. . . . From my formal and informal research, I found that the number one reason fundraisers leave is because they can't stand the management. They can't really find a great relationship with their executive director or their CEO and they can't find that synergy that's necessary to make the fundraising mechanism really strong.
Dolph: So, tell me a little bit about both the formal and informal research you did.
Emma: The informal research is me having a cup of coffee or a glass of wine with a colleague and asking why they are choosing to leave. And I've helped a lot of organizations fill positions both at the CDO level and also other fundraising levels. Major gift officers moving into the CDO level or similar experiences. Then the formal side is just reading good blogs good white papers and really understanding what the Association of Fundraising Professionals and the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Through all of this, I’ve also learned that this turnover occurs somewhere between 16th and 20th month.
Dolph: It's also interesting that part of your informal research is working with candidates because clearly you are working with someone who is looking at leaving their job. When you're acting as a search consultant you probably are having the conversation with them about why they want to leave.
Emma: That's exactly right and that's one of the questions I always ask. And you know sometimes people are a little hesitant to answer that question because they don't want to seem like they're giving their current organization a bad rap or that they're really saying anything negative about a manager or leader. But what I really like to do is dig into the reason they feel like they can't stay at their current job and develop those deep relationships. Because ultimately those relationships are what make fundraising successful. So, if you're leaving in 16 or 20 months you don't have the capacity to develop those long-term relationships that ultimately result in great big gifts for your organization that are transformational.
Dolph: It's interesting you say that because I've had this conversation multiple times with my alma mater. It feels like every two years I have a new development director assigned to me. This has happened three or four times, and I just had a frank conversation with the dean about it – explaining that this is an issue because, just as I start to develop a relationship with this person, they get poached by a bigger fundraising shop somewhere else.
Emma: That's right. And then the donor ends up having to tell your story over again. And so then there's a disconnect. You've just developed a relationship with a fundraiser and you've poured your heart and soul into that relationship a little bit. Remember the relationship between a donor and a fundraiser is a little bit like dating. And so you spent two years as a fund raiser courting that donor and you've really gotten to know them and what makes them tick and how they want to make a difference and what mission really drives them. And then the donor has to start all over again. It can be very frustrating for a donor and not really results oriented for the organization. It really can be harmful.
Dolph: Clearly, I can see how that's super harmful in major gifts. But talk to me about special events and annual campaigns. How is that detrimental to the organization on an annual campaign if most of it is done by mail or by volunteer solicitors?
Emma: You end up coming into a two-year cycle where the letter looks like X or Y for a couple of years and you start to develop a theme and a voice and donors really get interested in that and then they start really listening. Remember that donors need to hear you say your message seven, eight, nine, ten times sometimes before they really hear it. If they hear one voice for two years and followed by a break with another voice for two years, it really can interrupt the way that you're reaching your donors. It interrupts that message because the clarity and the uniformity and the theme disappears.
Dolph: So, what can the CEO do to help build that relationship?
Emma: So, the first thing is to avoid having expectations that are too high. This is the first thing that I often see with people who are leaving their CDO role. They're leaving because they say, “Oh the CEO doesn't really understand fundraising; they don't understand that it takes 9 – 18 months to develop relationships and really see donations come in. So as a CEO you really need to educate yourself become educated about how to set expectations for fundraising and work with your CDO to create those expectations so that the CDO isn't over promising and the CEO isn't over expecting.
Dolph: That’s an interesting observation. I was recently working with an organization that wanted to hire a development director starting in July and was hoping to see results by December. There's a lot of managing expectations, helping them understand they are likely not going to see a fundraising windfall happen after five or six months.
Emma: That's exactly right. I mean it takes us five or six months to be able to say the mission without a hiccup. If you're new to an organization, seeing results does take a full year if not up to two years because you've got to meet the donors and start developing those relationships. And I say again that it's like dating. You wouldn't expect to get engaged after five months probably. You've got to think the same thing with your donors; they are not going to make a bigger gift or stretch a little bit more until they really understand the person that they're working with.
Dolph: So what responsibility does the CDO have in building a good strong relationship with their CEO?
Emma: The first thing is frequent communication as fundraisers. We get our blinders on, look inward at our team and we say, “OK I need to raise five million dollars” or whatever the goal is and you get laser focused on how that's going to happen. Getting into the nuts and bolts of raising that money, CDOs often forget to have that open communication on a daily basis with their CEO. And so the CEO is out of the loop. . . . . right from that first day on the job, CDOs need to establish that trust with their CEO and that open line of communication.
Dolph: So daily communication. Tell me what that looks like. You know face to face, phone, e-mail etc. - what is that supposed to look like.
Emma: I once worked for an organization where we killed ourselves with meetings, to the ridiculous point where we could never get any work done. However, I will tell you there was no communication that slipped through the cracks. We were always on top of it as a team. Instead of killing yourself with meetings, I recommend daily communication of some sort. Maybe it's a weekly email to your CEO that says, “Hey I wanted you to know what's happening. These are the donors that moved forward. These are the donors that we’re stalled on. These are the things that we're deciding for the event of the annual campaign and putting that in writing. Then I also recommend a weekly sit down in person, not on the phone. Because there is something that you get from the personal face to face interaction that you can't get from the phone or from an e-mail. And then in the interim in between those two things there should be regular e-mails or phone calls or texts - - - whatever is your style. But we do need to remember that we often communicate in a style that's best for us.
Emma: But we need to really communicate in the style that's best for the other person. So if your CEO is a phone person call him or her on the phone; if they are text person do that instead. You really need to understand how your CEO needs to communicate and that's a two-way street.
Dolph: The weekly face-to-face meeting with my supervisor was one of the things that I did both as a development director and as a CEO. At my first development director gig, this concept was new to the CEO and I had introduced it to them. I’ve always believed in that weekly supervision meeting, with the person being supervised putting together the agenda ahead of time. The agenda doesn’t have to be in-depth, and is more frequently bullet points with just two or three sentences describing each. Of course, my CEO could add to that agenda if they wanted. But for me, drafting the agenda allowed me to really sit down and think about what I wanted to get out of that meeting, and it also gave my boss an opportunity to think about the topics we were going to discuss. This way, I could have the expectation to not often here, “Well let me think about X Y Z and get back to you next week.” You know I'd given them some core information upfront, and I was going to give them some more information in the meeting. Consequently, I was kind of expecting a decision either in the meeting or shortly after the meeting.
Emma: That's a great way to train yourself and to train your supervisor to be able to make decisions in meetings. After all, the problem with meetings is that often nothing happens and there's nothing worse than a terrible meeting where you just talk at one another and there's no decision and you just say, “OK well we'll meet again next week”. So I love that idea of an agenda, and I often encourage folks to do it by e-mail. You know you don't have to create a fancy word document or anything like that. Just put a couple of bullet points down and you know often the best CDOs are the ones who keep that as a running list. They add to the list all week long, so by the time they meet with the CEO they're not forgetting about things.
Dolph: I’ve often done it in excel, so each week is a new tab. Then I would send the entire excel spreadsheet to my boss, and they could see prior weeks’ tabs if they had forgotten something. It also made creating the next week's agenda easy because I would copy the last tab starting point. Let me share one of the things that I found really useful as an executive director, and I would love your feedback on whether this is an effective thing to do with CDO’s. As an executive director, we ended each meeting with a written meeting summary. It was quick and dirty, and we literally spent just the last five minutes of the meeting on it. This summary outlined decisions we made, action to be taken, who was going to do it, and the deadline. Part of what I loved about the meeting summary is that it allowed for mutual accountability. So often a supervisor tells their direct report, “I'm going to talk to Emma by next week”, but next week rolls around and the CEO just says, “oh sorry I forgot to do it.” But there's such a sense of accountability when your name is on a line and there's a deadline.
Emma: And then the person who reports to you can hold you accountable by saying, “I can't do this next step until you talk to Emma.” Accountability is the most important thing between a CEO and a CDO because, as C-suite positions, both are responsible for things that are very important and that impact the rest of the team. Making a list at the end of the meeting is a great idea. I've also done it in a Google document so that people can go in and make updates on their own. So that's another great way of implementing a good tool for a meeting.
Dolph: Are there other tools that you recommend CEOs and CEOs use.
Emma: So I am a big fan of a work plan. I often ask my clients to put into place some sort of work plan for the development function as a whole with then some tabs that are a little bit more granular. For example, the main tab has all the things we're going to accomplish this year as a development team. We have four events, three solicitations of capital gifts, major donor solicitations, etc. All of that is now together as a snapshot that a board member or executive director can look at and understand what's happening. So that's the first thing I'd recommend - updated weekly by the CDO weekly and by other team members.
Then additional tabs I the spreadsheet for in-depth detail of each goal. For the full benefit of the example, the in-depth tab might list all of the things that we need to do or decide on an event: location, linens, flowers, meal, etc. If somebody wants more granular information, it will be in the spreadsheet. And, again, I really like the idea of a shared to drive where everyone has access and can update it real time.
Dolph: Obviously, a strong and trusting relationship is important to ensuring that your CDO sticks around, but what else can CEOs and organizations do to break out of that cycle of CDOs resigning every 16 to 20 months?
Emma: The CEO's really needs to talk to the board about fundraising and advocate on behalf of the development team. The CEO needs to be that front line between the fundraising staff and the board. They really need to be there front and center and say here's what we're doing and why. Here's what's going well here's what's not going well. And here's how you board members need to help with fundraising.
Dolph: But so we've all seen board members say “We're going to step up to the plate. We're going to help with fundraising and folks might even take five names each.” Then six weeks later, none of those people have been called. No coffee has been poured. No meetings have occurred. So what happens from there?
Emma: It's so true and boy we see it all the time. I think I've seen it with almost every client that I've had and it's not because there's a lack of interest in trying on behalf of the board members or on behalf of the staff. Like I said, the CEO's job is to be that intermediary between their development staff and the board, and it's the CDO’s job to manage those individual tasks with the board members. To call me and say, “Emma you're a board member and said you're going to have coffee with Dolph. What have you done so far? How can I help you? Do you want me to set it up? Can I give you talking points?” The CDO’s role is to interface with those board members and be a taskmaster. Because I think often the struggle is that board members don't really feel like they have the tools and the tricks to do what they need to do. So they just avoid it, and it's easier to do that because they're volunteers. So CDO’s also often leave because they feel like the board isn't supporting them. But sometimes it's because the CDO really needs to understand how they need to support the board in order to make that work.
Dolph: That's what I was going to ask. Do you think most CDO’s fully understand that if a board member is not following through on fundraising tasks, they should call the person ask what help they need or offer to schedule the meeting?
Emma: I think CDOs often have so many things to do. They forget that volunteer board members are not immersed in the day-to-day of the nonprofit. They understand the mission; they're passionate; they’re donors (probably, hopefully). But they often still don't have everything they need to really get the job done. And I've found that the best way to approach a board member who isn't following through on commitments is to make a phone call or a coffee date with them to ask “What's keeping you from doing the things that you say you're going to do? Is it time? Is it tools? Is it me?” Board members may feel nervous, scared or don't feel trained and that is the CDO’s job for sure.
Dolph: Is there anything else that organizations can do to help increase that retention rate?
Emma: Two things. The first is celebrating success. Fundraising is really rewarding work but getting to those numbers year after year is really hard work. I recommend CEOs really celebrate any success small or large of your fundraising team. And I say that for CDOs as well. There's a lot of great energy that comes from celebrating the success of your team whether it's a team of one or a team of 20. So celebrate success in a way that works for your organization - whether it's a group lunch, a bell that you ring, small gifts, or days off or whatever. There are lots of different ways to motivate your staff to stick around. So that's the first thing. And then the second thing is professional development. Often CEOs forget that CDO’s while they're in a chief fundraising seat still have lots to learn. All of us have lots to learn. Fundraising is changing every day.
And there are new things every year that come out that we as fundraisers need to know about. So CEOs giving the CDOs a little bit of room to grow room to learn.
Dolph: I think it’s really critical to take the time to go to seminars, webinars and conferences. I certainly do this my own practice: I set aside about $5,000 a year for continuing education. And I find some of my most creative moments come because I'm sitting in a room with other colleagues and I start to get great ideas. Sometimes I even get ideas that aren’t even aligned with the topic of the conference or presentation. So I do think continuing education is really important for CDOs because they’re going to get great ideas and bring them back.
Emma: That's exactly right. Actually, that happened to me very recently I was at a great conference here in Pittsburgh. I was listening to this really powerful keynote speaker. And an idea came to me for my business that had nothing to do with what the keynote speaker. I mean you go out and it was really great creative space. We don't give ourselves time to do that. And a CDO often doesn't have time in their day to day to do that because you're managing teams and donors and managing up and out and over. So it's really great to create that space.
Dolph: Can I throw in one other idea that I think is really important to CDO retention. And it's a dirty word. It's a dirty word in the nonprofit sector but that word is “money”. While I don't really do searches, I help with succession planning for everybody in the C suite; and I'm always shocked when I talk to an organization that says, “We want a development director who can solicit six figure gifts, understands annual campaigns, and supervise a grant writer and a special events coordinator. We want to pay them $59,000 a year.” I'm always shocked because the organization essentially wants a high-end sales executive but pay for an entry level professional.
Emma: Right. That happens all the time. And this is also another dirty secret that nobody likes to talk about in nonprofits: You have to spend money to make money and to find a great professional. You need to really understand how to meet their needs salary-wise and benefits package. You need to really figure out how to do that so that they are rewarded for the hard work they do. There's a reason why in the AFP [Association of Fundraising Professionals] code of ethics you can't pay a consultant just for the money that they bring in. The CDO is working round the clock and often it's not a 9 to 5 job. And so you do need to compensate for that. I agree 100 percent.
Dolph: I recently had a breakfast conversation with a development director who had been at the same institution for a little more than 20 months. He said, “I'm currently being heavily recruited by this other organization which honestly pays their fundraisers 50 percent more.” He asked for my career advice whether to change jobs or stay with his current organization. I'm a major donor to his current employer, but I had to advise him to seriously consider the offer. I essentially said, “You're a young professional and you need to be thinking about your career. If you can get a 50 percent jump in salary now in your early 30s, that is going to pay dividends for the next 35 years. Especially if they have training and promotion opportunities that are as good or better than your current organization.” He ultimately decided to accept the job, and his former lost a really promising young development professional because they just weren't willing to pay what the market demands.
Emma: I think paying what the market demands is really important. And I think some nonprofits forget to do their homework. They forget to look at what their sister and brother organizations are doing (their competitors, their peers). You really need to look at this because it's easy to jump in development with skills transferring easily. And there are lots of opportunities for jumping up both in seniority and also in salary. And so really thinking about these two things: how do you professionally develop somebody (whether it's through adding more responsibilities, giving them opportunities to go to conferences, etc.) but then also the salary.
Dolph: Those two things are critical to keeping fundraisers. My number-one favorite objection I hear from nonprofits about paying their development officer more is this: if we pay our development director more, they'll make more than our executive director. We’ll have to pay our executive director more too. I just find that objection really funny because they’re expecting a lot from their executive director, too, and probably underpaying them as well.
Dolph: Thank you so much for being our first guest of the new year, Emma. The podcast is starting the year off with a bang because you are on this episode. Here’s a warning to everybody who's coming on the podcast after you. You have set the bar high, and I am excited that you have set the bar high. Thanks to all.
Dolph: I'm especially grateful that you shared ways to help increase the retention of CDO’s because I think that's critical to the success of nonprofits. Now if an organization is interested in working with you - whether it's around CDOs, coaching, or some other consulting need, they can find you at PilotPeakConsulting.com and here’s the last question that I knew I wanted to ask you. PilotPeak Consulting is an interesting name for a consulting firm. Most of us are not so creative; we have things like Goldenburg Group or Smith Consulting & Associates. What is the story behind PilotPeak Consulting.
Emma: I really love the state of Wyoming, and I spent my childhood summers there. My favorite mountain in northwest Wyoming is called Pilot Peak, which is a mountain that served as a beacon because of its very pointy and specific profile. It served as a beacon for pioneers that were seeking a path through the uncharted wilderness that is now Yellowstone National Park. For me, when I think about consulting, I think about myself as sort of a mountaineering guide: You have a place you want to get to, and I'm someone who can lead you there. So that's how Pilot Peak came about.
Dolph: I love it! That is a great origin story. Well thank you again for being on the podcast.
Emma: Thank you so much I really enjoyed it.
Nota Bene: Since this was originally published as an audio podcast, we have lightly edited the transcript. You can hear the entire interview at the Successful Nonprofits Podcast Website.
Thanking those who are leaving your board helps them transition from board member to staunch supporter and advocate.
Whether they are hitting term limits or choosing to not seek another term, genuinely expressing gratitude for their service has the powerful ability to connect them to the organization in an indelible way.
A few ways I have said thank you to departing board members (or been thanked myself as a departing board member) include:
In addition to using a couple of the items above, my favorite way to recognize an outgoing board members is the personal thank you note. Whether hand written or typed, this note expresses my genuine thanks and identifies significant contributions the person made to the organization.
Outgoing board members who received these letters have often called or emailed to share how meaningful the thank you letter was to them. Since the nerd/archivist in me likes to keep copies of letters I send, I’m able to share a sample with you (the names of the organization and board member has been changed to the fictitious Ostrich Place, and you can click on the photo to download the word document).
About the Author:
Click Here for Dolph Ward Goldenburg's Bio
By Guest Contributor Katelyn Murphy McCarthy
About 64,300,000 results in 0.69 seconds
That's what you get when you Google Strategic Planning Process. The Google search links to scholarly articles, general guidelines, ads for templates and consultants, and lots of do-it-yourself models. There is no shortage of information about strategic planning.
Undoubtedly, a strategic plan is a comprehensive yet easily readable document that serves as a roadmap to the future, keeping the organization on track while maintaining focus on mission and vision. Good strategic plan goals are quantifiable and reviewed on a quarterly basis.
Surely then, every nonprofit organization has a strategic plan, right? Well…maybe not.
Over half of nonprofits lack a current strategic plan
“Maybe they had one in 1976, or one that ended in 2016," according to Dolph Goldenburg, firm principal with the Goldenburg Group. "Those that have a strategic plan often do it because a funder requires it. Sometimes the executive director and board chair throw it together, ask for board approval, and call it a strategic plan. And a number of organizations use consultants who claim to be able to deliver a strategic plan for $500-$1,000.”
Goldenburg has participated in strategic planning processes from multiple viewpoints: twice as an executive director, multiple times as a board member, once as a board chair, and many times as the facilitating consultant.
"I've taken the best of strategic planning from each experience, and combined them into a process I call Participatory Strategic Planning.”
Participatory Strategic Planning
The participatory planning process starts with the formation of a work group. The consultant designs a comprehensive environmental scan for the work group to complete, and an important component of the scan is the identification and interviewing of key stakeholders. Analysis of financial trends, programmatic outcomes, fundraising assessment, board effectiveness and future trends are also developed and reviewed by the work group.
At a full board retreat, the work group presents its findings and recommendations for the board’s consideration and feedback. Following the retreat, the consultant and work group develop tactical plans for achieving the agreed-upon goals, and a final strategic plan is approved by the full board.
A unique aspect of Goldenburg's process is quarterly check-ins with the director and board chair for a full year after the strategic plan is approved. Following each check-in, Goldenburg prepares a report for the board to review.
What does this look in real life?
Two Atlanta-area nonprofits recently went through the Participatory Strategic Planning process with The Goldenburg Group. Each brought unique needs to the table, and they will be featured in upcoming blog posts this month.
January is a great time to cultivate all the donors who gave to your organization in 2017 and make it even more likely that they will give again this year.
To cultivate those who gave last year, I suggest sending a thank you letter that shares the many accomplishments donors’ 2017 gifts made possible. As an added benefit for your donors, this letter should also include a tax summary of all 2017 gifts. This will help them feel positive about their gifts, while also helping to complete their tax records.
A sample January donor thank you letter from the fictitious Ostrich Place nonprofit is below, along with an example of the annual donation summary. Click on either image to download the document as a Word file.
As certain as the ball drops in New York’s Time Square and the peach drops at Woodruff Park, most nonprofit executives and board members make New Year’s resolutions.
Many of us start the year with resolutions to hopefully make us healthier, wealthier and wiser. If you are like me, you woke up January 1st with the sensation that 365 days lay ahead of us and felt genuine in our goals to make the most of each day. On the morning of January 1, while finishing our New Year cards, I turned to my husband and said, “Let’s grab the New Year and squeeze the absolute most out of 2018!”
Regardless of whether January is the start of a new fiscal year for your organization, this is an ideal time to ask your board to set some resolutions for itself. And, unlike exercise routines and diets that so many of us set aside, we should ask the board to schedule specific actions for each month that make the board stronger and better able to guide the organization.
As your board considers its own resolutions, the suggestions below may help start the board-level conversation.
Board members resolve to attend at least 83% of all board meetings. This is ten meetings for boards convening monthly and five for boards gathering six times a year (note: If you don’t believe board attendance is important, read this related article “6 Reasons Board Attendance Matters”).
The board and staff resolve to develop an annual calendar with all board meetings and major events. Once the calendar has been published, meeting dates won’t be changed to accommodate an officer, a staff member, or the landlord.
Board members resolve to declare in writing the amount they plan to give this fiscal year, including the approximate timing and method of the gifts.
Board members resolve to declare their fundraising goals for the year, including the fundraising opportunities they will use to achieve this goal.
Staff resolve to provide board members with all meeting materials with sufficient time for board members to review before the meeting, and board members resolve to review meeting packets before the meeting.
The board resolves to evaluate the executive director in a timely manner and also resolves to conduct a meaningful evaluation of itself and its members.
Board members and staff resolve to respond to each other in a timely manner. This includes returning required organizational documents without multiple reminders (such as an annual conflict of interest disclosure).
Staff resolve to accurately track achievement of board goals and provide regular updates to individual members, as well as the entire board.
Board Management Software:
Whether you're looking to better track board achievement, manage board documents, or have an online way to increase engagement and responsiveness, a cloud-based board management tool might be a relatively low-cost solution. Boardable CEO Jeb Banner shares his guide for knowing when your board will benefit from an online board management tool on his company's blog: When Should My Nonprofit Invest In Board Management Software.
The board resolves to celebrate its successes – both as individuals and as a governing body.
Whether this is a champagne toast at the end of a meeting to celebrate a successful event or praise circle for a board member who has gone above and beyond – find ways to celebrate that are appropriate to your organization.
Remember that board service is supposed to be something we enjoy and relish – not a hard slog through a bloody battlefield. So as individual board members, let’s all find ways to find true joy in our service while being the board members our organizations deserve.
These are just a few suggested topics that will revolutionize your board if they are not already standard practice. In order to fulfill these board resolutions, be certain to include them in your annual board plan or your organization’s annual schedule. Some resolutions, such as attendance or giving, can be reviewed at each meeting. Other resolutions, such as evaluating the executive director, can be scheduled now.
This year will pass as quickly as the one before it, and we can make choices now that influence whether our boards will be stronger by the end of the year. And remember: a strong board will help your organization achieve its mission!
About the author:
Click here for Dolph Ward Goldenburg's bio
5 Things Every Fundraiser Should Do the Last Week of the Year H1
When I was the Development Director at the St. Vincent de Paul Society, the agency always closed the final week of the year. As the chief fundraising officer, however, I came into the office every day between December 26 and December 31 – excited about another great day of cultivating donors and receiving those year-end gifts.
Let me be clear that the time between Christmas day and New Years eve is precious to me – often spent with friends and family. But it’s also the time when many donors make end-of-year giving decisions and begin thinking about their plans for the coming year. This week can be among your most productive if you do the following 5 tasks:
#1: Remind board members of their annual financial commitments
Whether your fiscal year ends December 31, July 31, or some other date, your board members are thinking about their end of tax-year giving now (and so are the people they might solicit). For this reason, remind board members about their personal giving and fundraising commitments using a simple report like this:
Since this report should come from a peer, the best person to send the report is the Board Chair, Development Committee Chair, or Governance Chair. They should also call the board member before sending the report.
#2: Call board members who met their annual financial commitments to say “thank you”
Many of your board members probably met their give/get months ago, but this is still a good time of year to call and express your gratitude for their fundraising and philanthropic efforts this year.
#3: Call your largest 10 donors and thank them for supporting your organization
This is a brief call (or often a brief voicemail) to say “thank you” to your largest donors and share how their gift helped your organization achieve its mission this year. At no point in the call should you ask for an additional gift, though you may receive one or two surprise checks in the coming week.
#4: Send thank you letters for all gifts received in the past few weeks
The time leading up to Christmas day and New Years day are often hectic, and sometimes development officers fall behind on thank you letters in December. But donors are always impressed when a gift is acknowledged within days of being mailed. So, with many of your colleagues out of the office this week, you probably have the extra time to merge and mail acknowledgement letters just a bit more quickly.
#5: Solicit 2016 donors who haven’t given yet this year
Your CRM undoubtedly has a LYBUNT report (LYBUNT is jargon for donors who gave Last Year But Unfortunately Not This). Run the LYBUNT report sorted in descending order from highest gift to lowest gift. Start at the top of the list with the highest lapsed donor and begin making calls. In each call or voice mail, express your sincere appreciation for their support and ask that they make an end of year gift to your organization today. If you have hundreds of LYBUNTS, you won’t be able to call them all - - - but try to call your top 20 – 50 donors who gave in 2016 but haven’t yet given in 2017.